What we found from our discussion in last night’s class is that within college athletics, revenue generating sports teams (i.e. Men’s Football) are given the most resources ($$$) and accommodations over non-revenue generating sports teams (i.e. all women’s sports, other men’s Olympic sports), even revenue generating Men’s Basketball.
Just yesterday afternoon, a blog article was posted on The Chronicle of Higher Education titled
“Charter Flights for Athletes Aren’t Always What They Seem.” In this article,
Brad Wolverton discusses the travel situation of the Stanford University
softball team after the NCAA regional softball tournament in Nebraska and the “accommodations”
the NCAA provided. Apparently, the NCAA covers the travel costs for teams
during postseason championships. The NCAA told the Cardinals that they had
arranged for a charter flight to get the team back to Palo Alto in time for
classes on Monday.
A “charter” flight is along the lines of first-class right?
That’s what I would think and that’s what the team thought too, but that is not
quite what the NCAA meant. Kevin Blue, the Associate Athletics Director of
Business Strategy at Stanford tweeted his surprise and described the plane as a
“rickety old prop plane,” which was too small to even carry their equipment
which had to stay in Nebraska. Blue did say however, that he appreciated that
the NCAA made accommodations so that the team could get back to class.
Is this situation an
outlier experience due to the location of the team in Nebraska and their
destination?
The current senior Associate Athletic Director at the
University of Portland, Karen Peters tweeted in response to Blue that her “Men’s
Soccer team was on a prop plane from ABQ [Albuquerque] to Virginia 2 years ago”
and that “travel [is] driven by cost, not stu-athl [student-athlete] experience.”
Ok, maybe this
situation was not a random outlier experience, but, was this charter/prop plane
the only available at the time because of the storms in the area? Are we
certain that all of the travel accommodations are driven by cost?
Whatever the answers are…I don’t think this would have
happened if it was a Men’s Football team, even if the team is larger by 50
student-athletes, do you think they would
have sent them out on a prop plane?
Does the NCAA do the
same thing that some college athletic directors do with the budget and
prioritize based on sport?
I’d be curious to know the answer.
Lisa Chow
KIN 577
No comments:
Post a Comment